The change recognises the unique nature of farming operations, ensuring farmers can provide accommodation for incoming agricultural workers, regardless of whether they are employed directly or self-employed. Without it, the Bill would only allow properties to be regained for employed workers, leaving some farm businesses struggling to accommodate self-employed workers.
91仓库worked closely with Lord Carrington2 to redraft the amendment, and has spent recent weeks securing cross-party support, including at a breakfast in Westminster hosted by NFU Vice-president Rachel Hallos for senior peers.
While this result does not mean the amendment is yet law, it marks a major step forward in making sure the final Bill takes into account the real-world needs of farming businesses.
NFU President Tom Bradshaw said: 鈥淭his is a step in the right direction when it comes to protecting rural businesses and ensuring housing remains available for essential workers.
鈥淔armers rely on being able to house their workers 鈥� including self-employed workers who play a vital role in food production. Without this amendment, businesses could face real difficulties planning for their workforce and keeping their day-to-day operations running smoothly.
鈥淭his has been an area the NFU has been working on in the background for many months, and I鈥檇 like to thank Lord Carrington for his support. It鈥檚 encouraging to see the Lords recognise how important this issue is to farming. But there is more to do.
鈥淲e hope the Government will take this opportunity to reflect on the strength of support for these amendments and adopts them as part of the Bill. We stand ready to work with ministers to get this legislation right for British farming.鈥�
听