91²Ö¿â

Proposals to ban heather burning undermine upland farmers' work

Environment and climate
Heather on a hill

Photograph: /Unsplash

Proposals to extend a ban on the burning of heather in areas of deep peat are unlikely to achieve their aims and threaten the viability of already hard-pressed uplands farms, the NFU has said.

In its response to a Defra consultation in May, the NFU stressed the importance of the upland farming sector in vegetation management that reduces the risks to peat from wildfires.

It questioned the evidence behind aspirations to ‘rewet’ all deep peatlands.

The submission said the proposals as set out would ‘significantly increase the risk of wildfires’, putting people, livestock and the environment in danger.

At the same time, they would undermine the sustainability of businesses reliant on upland grazing, reducing palatable forage and increasing animal welfare threats from ticks in overgrown vegetation.

“Defra’s proposed changes to heather and grassland burning lack proven evidence and seriously undermine upland farmers’ ability to manage some of our most treasured landscapes and care for the environment.â€

NFU Deputy President David Exwood

Uplands farmers facing huge challenges

Upland farmers, the NFU added, already faced threats on several fronts, including government decisions on inheritance tax, a lack of access to Environmental Land Management schemes and accelerated cuts to delinked payments, as well as proposals in the recent Land Use Framework.

NFU Deputy President David Exwood said: “Defra’s proposed changes to heather and grassland burning lack proven evidence and seriously undermine upland farmers’ ability to manage some of our most treasured landscapes and care for the environment. 

“With one of the driest springs on record and data suggesting wildfires are on the rise, restricting burning could allow vegetation to become overgrown, further increasing wildfire risk and damage to the soil, peatland and wildlife. These proposals also risk undermining the productivity and sustainability of upland farms.

“To protect the environment and restore peatland – a shared goal we have with Defra – while keeping upland businesses at the heart of rural communities, it’s essential that Defra conducts an impact assessment and invests in research into cool burning as a viable alternative.â€

What was in the consultation?

Proposed changes to the Heather and Grass etc. Burning (England) Regulations 2021 would see the current definition of ‘deep peat’ revised to include anything over 30cm, rather than the current 40cm, and use Less Favoured Areas to determine the regulated area, rather than sites of special scientific interest, special protection, or areas of conservation.

More than 146,000 extra hectares of land would become ‘in scope’.

Elsewhere, the licensing system would require applicants to ‘successfully explain’ why alternative methods of heather control have not, or would not, work.

At least one person conducting a burn would need to have completed mandatory training.

The proposals are supported by a new England Peat Map, a detailed, open-access map of peatlands, covering extent, depth, and condition published earlier in the month. Early feedback from NFU members has suggested inaccuracies in the Natural England project.

More from 91²Ö¿â:

NFU members, join our Environment and climate community to comment

This page was first published on 03 April 2025. It was updated on 28 May 2025.


Ask us a question about this page

Once you have submitted your query someone from NFU CallFirst will contact you. If needed, your query will then be passed to the appropriate NFU policy team.

You have 0 characters remaining.

By completing the form with your details on this page, you are agreeing to have this information sent to the NFU for the purposes of contacting you regarding your enquiry. Please take time to read the NFU’s Privacy Notice if you require further information.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google and apply.